Australian Archives Accession, Brighton (Melbourne), Victoria.

MP 742 DEPT. CA 36 Army: Correspondence Files, Multiple Number Series, 1943-1951

file: 299/3/39 "Carrying of Firearms on Hospital Ship Centaur. "

01)LHQ Memo (ref. SM.176) 5 Jan. '43 - Memo from Dept. of the Army (Adjutant-General) signed by Col. L.E. Vail for Adj. Gen - concerning the 'USE OF HOSPITAL SHIPS' - memo cancells previous SM.18938 20 Oct. '42. Details instructions to be observed by all Australian Military personnel responsible for embarking personnel or loading medical equipment and stores on hospital ships.

02)LHQ Memo (ref. SM.2023) 28 Jan. '43 - Memo from Dept. of the Army (Adjutant-General) signed by Col. L.E. Vail for Adj. Gen - concerning the 'USE OF HOSPITAL SHIPS' - memo defines certain interpretations to be observed concerning Con Depots, Etomological Units and Hygiene Sections (not medical units...not carried as "complete miliotary medical units" nor personnel individually... Chaplains and Red Cross personnell not carried unless they are..War Establishment of H.S. or appointed to ship's staff...or other medical unit.

03)Letter 26 May '43 from Mr. Andrew Gerrand to Prime Minister Curtin - "...almost commom knowledge that there was a breach of the Geneva Convention in that a Field Unit fully equipped was on board...also authoritatively informed that the Captain raised objection...and had to be ordered to sail by the authorities."

04)Minute Paper 3 June '43 (copy of a telephone message from Sydney) from F.M.Forde to Mr. Sinclair - Carrying of Firearms on hospital ship "Centaur" - Forde advised that 50 or 60 rifles were taken aboard Centaur in Sydney and would like to be advised as to the carriage of firearms on hospital ships in regard to International Convention.

05)Minute paper 4 June '43 - from Lieut.-General i/c Administration, Dept. of the Army to the Secretary (for information of the Minister) - Reference to Firearms on Hospital Ship Centaur - explains for the Minister that based upon S.M.'s 176 & 2023 carriage of a field ambulance together with A.A.S.C. personnel and their weapons did not constitute a breach of the Convention.

06)Letter (ref. M53/4/473) 21 June '43 From Col. Hector Clayton (?), H.Q. 1st. Aust Movement Control Group,Sydney to Movement Control, Melbourne - refers to SM.14847 (19/6) and states that Capt. Murray did not raise any objection...untrue that he was ordered to sail. Lt - Col Manson, O.C.Troops, asked S.T.O. and Clayton on the afternoon before sailing to confirm that the carriage of 2/12 Fd. Amb. as a complete unit with attached A.A.S.C. personnel bearing arms was in order. SM 176 produced and Manson expressed complete satisfaction. To be doubly assured Maj. MacKinnon of Movement Section both he and Navy confirmed the regularity of the embarkation.

07)Letter 2 July '43 from Minister F. M. Forde to Prime Minister Curtin - replies to Curtin's request (28 May '43) concerning Gerrand's letter of 26 May '43.- rumopurs due to misunderstanding of Geneva Convention as adapted to maritime warfare...concerning ambulance drivers boarding with their rifles..."provisions of the Geneva and Hague Conventions were scrupulously observed in regard to the "Centaur".